Kenyan President Uhuru
Kenyatta need not attend all of his trial on charges of crimes against
humanity, the International Criminal Court has said.
Mr Kenyatta has argued that attending the trial in The Hague would prevent him from governing the country.
Both Mr Kenyatta and his deputy William Ruto deny charges of organising violence after the 2007 election.
Friday's ruling states that the Kenyan
president must be physically present during the opening and closing
statements, hearings where victims "present their views and concerns in
person," the verdict, and any other sessions determined by the court.
The decision was by a majority vote as presiding judge Kuniko Ozaki did not agree with the other two judges.
Last week, the African Union urged the UN Security Council to delay Mr Kenyatta's trial, which is due to start on 12 November.
African leaders accuse the ICC of unfairly targeting the continent; all the court's current cases are from Africa, and two serving presidents, Mr Kenyatta and Sudan's Omar al-Bashir, have been indicted.
On Thursday a spokesman for the Kenyan
presidency, Manoah Esipisu, told the BBC's Focus on Africa programme
that there "needs to be a balance between the legal process and his
right to govern".
Mr Ruto's trial began in September. He too was granted an exemption from attending parts of his trial, but the prosecution lodged an appeal against that decision, which is currently suspended.
The BBC's Anna Holligan, in The Hague, says the uncertainty over Mr Ruto's exemption means there is no guarantee that Mr Kenyatta's will be granted.
Mr Ruto's trial was adjourned for a week to allow him to return to Nairobi in the aftermath of the Westgate mall siege.
William Ruto's trial began in The Hague on 10 September
No comments:
Post a Comment